May, 2008
Mind Drivers Selects StrongMail to Power YouChoose.net Cause-Based Online Community
Comment on this... (0 comments) May 30, 2008Messaging Architects Announces a More Efficient and Cost-Effective Way to Mitigate Email Risks with New Release of M+Guardian
Comment on this... (1 comments) May 30, 2008Jatheon Technologies Improves E-mail Health at The Medcan Clinic
Comment on this... (1 comments) May 30, 2008(Survey Now Closed)
We are doing a survey of users of archiving products (e.g., EMC Legato, Symantec Vault, Zantaz/Autonomy), to see how good the products are in practice. We’ll use the information to produce a Consumer Reports-style comparative assessment.
If you are using an electronic archiving product or service and would like to participate, please go to (survey now closed). The survey takes about five minutes to complete. We ask you to score the product in areas such as:
- E-discovery support
- Storage management features
- Support for laws/regulations/policy compliance
- Scalability
- Quality of vendor support
- Overall value for money
In return, we will send you a summary of the results.
This is an ongoing survey. Because there are about 15 products under evaluation, we’re seeking ultimately to gather several thousand responses.
Nemx Launches SecurExchange for Microsoft Exchange 2007
Comment on this... (0 comments) May 29, 2008Online Storage Service Integrated with Everyone.net Web Mail
Comment on this... (0 comments) May 29, 2008Ensim Announces Upgrades for Unify Active Directory Manager
Comment on this... (1 comments) May 29, 2008Configuresoft’s Center for Policy and Compliance(CP&C) Expands Desktop Security for Windows with Federal Desktop Core Configuration (FDCC) Toolkits
Comment on this... (0 comments) May 29, 2008Expanding on: Steve Kille’s recent bulletin about IP reputation. SPF isn’t exactly a “reputation mechanism” — although it can be used to help identify the sender, in order to make improved reputation-based decisions.
SPF, DKIM, and other “sender authentication” schemes help a receiving MTA decide if it knows which domain sent a message. For example, SPF can tell if the sending IP address 1.2.3.4 is authorized to send mail claiming to be from example.com and DKIM can tell if the incoming message was signed by example.com’s private key.
If the receiving MTA knows the sending domain, it doesn’t need to rely on the reputation of the sending IP address, which can be a blunt instrument. It allows domains themselves to have reputations. It’s especially useful for whitelisting known-good domains, so that mail from them doesn’t fall victim to the false-positive problem.
(Another common way of describing SPF et al is: mechanisms to detect forgeries, which amounts to the same thing but in a different context.)
What type of disk I/O is recommended with VMWare? Is it Raw Disk?
bob.
Please Wait
Leave a Reply