Search
Browse by Topic
- Ferris Deliverables
- Topics
- Vendors and Products
- Attenex
- Autonomy/Zantaz
- AXS-One
- Blue Coat
- Borderware
- C2C
- CA/Ilumin
- CaseCentral
- Cetaphora
- Cisco/Ironport
- Clearswift
- Clearwell
- Code Green
- CommVault
- EMC
- Fortiva
- GFI
- Global Relay
- Google/Postini
- H&S
- HP/IAP
- IBM CommonStore
- IBM Notes/Domino
- IBM Quickplace
- Iron Mountain/Stratify
- Kazeon
- LiveOffice
- Marshal
- McAfee
- MessageLabs
- MessageOne
- Microsoft Exchange/Outlook
- Mimosa Systems
- Open Text/Hummingbird
- Oracle/Stellent
- Orchestria
- Other Products
- Permessa
- Proofpoint
- Quest
- Reconnex
- RPost
- Seagate/EVault/MetaLINCS
- Sherpa Software
- SonicWALL
- Symantec/Vault/Veritas/Vontu
- Tablus
- Titus Labs
- Trend Micro
- Vericept
- Waterford
- Websense/Port Authority/SurfControl
- ZL Technologies
Archives
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
- February 2003
- January 2003
- December 2002
- November 2002
- October 2002
- September 2002
- August 2002
- July 2002
- June 2002
- May 2002
- April 2002
- March 2002
- February 2002
- January 2002
- December 2001
- October 2001
- September 2001
- August 2001
- July 2001
- June 2001
- May 2001
- April 2001
- March 2001
- December 2000
- October 2000
- September 2000
- August 2000
- July 2000
- June 2000
- May 2000
- April 2000
- March 2000
- February 2000
- January 2000
- December 1999
- November 1999
- October 1999
- September 1999
- July 1999
- June 1999
- April 1999
- March 1999
- February 1999
- January 1999
November, 2005
If you are a subscriber to our Analyzer Information Service, please log in to view subscriber attachments.
Which E12 Upgrades Will Be Inexpensive?
Two to Four Million Cellphones Have Tight Integration With Consumer Messaging 
Comment on this (0 comments)Nov 30, 2005
If you are a subscriber to our Analyzer Information Service, please log in to view subscriber attachments.
Two to Four Million Cellphones Have Tight Integration With Consumer Messaging
Exchange has a Global Address List, or GAL. As the name suggests, this is intended to be an organization’s main directory.
However, it doesn’t usually work that way. For a start, often the directory of record is kept in a third-party repository, such as a PeopleSoft directory or a relational database.
But suppose your organization uses the GAL as the directory of record. Things don’t work the way they should. For example:
- You still have personal address books.
- Some GAL information--notably people’s email addresses--is put into personal address books.
- Often information in personal address books is more current. For example, when people change their cellphones, they often don’t update the GAL, but instead notify their personal acquaintances.
- GAL information is only available if you have IP connectivity.
- GAL information isn’t synchronized with handheld devices.
All in all, the overlap between personal address books and the GAL is confusing. It should be cleaned up.
… David Ferris, with thanks to itrezzo’s Vern Weitzman
Panda Prepares To Battle Corporate Espionage
Nov 30, 2005InformationWeek: Click Here for Story
If you are a subscriber to our Analyzer Information Service, please log in to view subscriber attachments.
Text Message Spam a Minor Problem
itrezzo’s Business Continuity Solution Keeps Cellphone Contacts Up-to-Date 
Comment on this (0 comments)Nov 29, 2005
If you are a subscriber to our Analyzer Information Service, please log in to view subscriber attachments.
itrezzo’s Business Continuity Solution Keeps Cellphone Contacts Up-to-Date
It’s hard to tell, because many of the details aren’t out yet. However, based on internal discussions, discussions with Microsoft, and discussions with third parties, here’s our best sense at the moment.
We think most organizations will find total upgrade costs of $150 to $250 per mailbox.
We expect the main cost components to be:
- New hardware. Figure $5,000 per server.
- Software. Pricing hasn’t been announced, but we guess client access licenses will be around $70 each, and Exchange Server around $5,000 per server. These costs are similar to today, though will apply to customers without Software Assurance.
- Labor deploying new desktop software. You won’t be forced to touch clients. However, many attractive new features of E12 will likely require client upgrades, such as the unified messaging, enhanced mobile support, and task-oriented Outlook/Office 12 user interface.
- User time. The new features will require time for users to learn.
- Technical support labor. The new Exchange System Manager interface will take time to learn. It’s too early to tell the cost and impact of rearchitecting, say from Exchange Routing Groups to Windows Sites; hopefully E12 provides tools.
The overall level of effort, however, is likely to be less than moving from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000/2003, because the move to Active Directory is already accomplished.
… David Ferris and Lee Benjamin, with thanks to Azaleos CTO Keith McCall
If you are a subscriber to our Analyzer Information Service, please log in to view subscriber attachments.
Email Security Suite Selection Criteria
Symantec Releases Enterprise Vault Compliance Accelerator 6.0 for Electronic Messaging Sampling and Review
Comment on this... (0 comments) Nov 29, 2005Over the last half of 2005, I’ve gradually become aware of a change in work styles:
- People are working harder than ever.
- There’s a greater level of frustration associated with the work.
- People have the sense of never being able to catch up.
In part, this is due to the reviving economy in the United States. But mainly, I suspect it’s due to email:
- It’s common now that people receive 80 or more emails per day.
- Many people have the habit of constantly checking for new email, and allowing themselves to be interrupted by new email.
- People constantly try to keep the inbox down to a minimal level.
What this means is that work is driven by the random dictates of arriving email. Minor tasks constantly divert people from more important ones. This translates to stress and frustration, the correct feeling that one simply can’t keep up and that things that should be done aren’t getting done.
We have to recognize that we can’t let the inbox dictate how we spend our time. It’s bad for business, and bad for people.
My personal approach is:
- Schedule time for important tasks.
- Try to check for email only at the end of tasks; ideally, only four or five times daily.
- Create the following parallel inboxes:
- Inbox-Do today.
- Inbox-Do over the next two days.
- Inbox-Do over the next week.
- Inbox-Do over the next two weeks.
- Inbox-Long term.
- Deal with email immediately if that can be done in a few seconds.
- Otherwise, put a new email into one of the parallel inboxes.
- When there is free time, scan the Inbox-Do today inbox, and deal with email there.
- On a daily basis, review all the parallel inboxes, and move email to different inboxes as appropriate.
BorderWare Delivers Unprecedented Spyware and Hostile Perimeter Protection
Comment on this... (0 comments) Nov 28, 2005If you are a subscriber to our Analyzer Information Service, please log in to view subscriber attachments.
AOL “Triton” IM Client Contains Shovelware
If you are a subscriber to our Analyzer Information Service, please log in to view subscriber attachments.
Symantec’s Range of Email Security Offerings
We were recently updated by Roaring Penguin Software. The company sells software based on Linux and other UNIX-like operating systems. We were particularly interested in the company’s anti-spam offering, CanIt.
CanIt incorporates the usual cocktail of spam filtering techniques, including Bayesian content analysis, greylisting, and SPF. It’s based on the open source project, MIMEDefang.
One unusual and interesting aspect of CanIt is called Locked Addresses. This allows a user to create a unique alias for the exclusive use of a particular sender or domain. For example, if you want to give out your email address to a web site, you use CanIt’s web interface to create a new alias, telling it that the alias should only accept email from a single domain, or from a specific email address. CanIt rejects email sent by other domains. You don’t need to tell CanIt which domain to restrict receipt from — CanIt will assume that the first message received is from the intended domain. Simple, yet effective.
Please Wait